Insights, guides, and updates
Sequoia Capital says tax advisory is 80-90% intelligence work — rule-following, not judgment. Nate Jones argues most of what we call judgment is rules we've internalized so deeply we forgot they were rules. If they're right, the moat accountants keep defending on LinkedIn is real — but much narrower than the profession assumes.
AI matches experienced professionals 70-83% of the time. The profession's biggest complaint — that AI gets things wrong — is actually a description of where your professional value lives. The 17-30% where you catch the error, push back, and explain why? That's judgment. And it's the one skill nobody in the profession is developing deliberately.
The research was valuable. What happened next was more valuable — a 10-minute reflective conversation with the AI that turned a one-off project into a reusable methodology anyone in the firm can follow. That's context engineering. And it's how you stop losing what you learn.
A cross-border tax research project revealed a material legal error — not because AI got it wrong, but because the back-and-forth dialogue forced both sides to test every assumption. The best use of AI for complex professional work isn't asking questions. It's arguing until the answer survives.
Canopy is embedding AI bookkeeping directly into practice management — real-time GL visibility, issue detection, and month-end close automation inside the tool you already use. Plus OpenAI's $110 billion bet on agentic AI, Anthropic removing the last barrier to switching, and why 30,000 accounting firms watched one AI demo in three days.
Marketing teams are seeing 90% cost reductions. Customer success teams are doubling productivity. And Anthropic's own data shows financial roles have an 85% theoretical AI capability with only 20% actual adoption. The gap between other industries and CAS practices isn't closing. It's widening — and it's measurable.
